While I'm covering that, follow @thompsoncarolk for updates from day 5 of former MSU president Lou Anna Simon's preliminary hearing.

lansingstatejournal.com/story/news/loc…

Says she's shown that -- that Strampel had power over young women he made inappropriate comments to

Hagaman-Clark starts with language, going over several of the comments witnesses have said Strampel made to them during meetings in his office

"These statements are made to them by the person who is the dean of their medical school. That’s what makes this criminal."

Hagaman-Clark going through the elements she must prove and how she's done that, starting with misconduct in office.

"It is not against the law to tell somebody that ‘I get hard when I perform exams on you.’ The manner in which those statements are made is the wrongful manner."

Wrongful manner -- "That specifically goes to all of those student meetings...His conduct in those meetings was misconduct. The sexual innuendo."

Says the comments were combined with staring at their breasts and looking them up and down

Hagaman-Clark says the comments were "absolutely" offensive given the context -- students meeting with him asking to retake an exam or a class

Stories from three other women -- Alison Perkins, Kimberly Anglin and Therese Copeland -- can be considered for the idea of "corrupt intent"

She's going through Perkins' story.

Of him making eye contact during a pelvic exam and making comments on pubic hair and breasts: “There was no other reason for him to do that other than his own sexual gratification.”

Runs through other comments Anglin testified Strampel made, including getting hard during exams and her looking sexy in a sports car

"Clearly had more interest in her than just as a clinical skills model."

On to the next count: 2nd-degree criminal sexual conduct.

They have to find three things:
1. Strampel groped Dr. Jessica Neuroth
2. It was for a sexual purpose
3. It occurred in tandem with misconduct in office

Her story is backed up by testimony from Dr. Nicole Eastman.

Eastman's testimony, like that of Perkins, Anglin and Copeland, goes to intent rather than the charge itself

Hagaman-Clark going through how Strampel having misused his power to make inappropriate comments to Neuroth (misconduct in office) meant he knew he could get away with groping her

On it being wilfull: "It's the complete indifference."

Three other witnesses said they were under the impression Strampel would handle Nassar, at least related to the Title IX investigation and protocols the former sports medicine doctor agreed to follow when he returned to seeing patients

Hagaman Clark: It's that willful disregard for anything to do with Nassar after 2014.

Hagaman-Clark says if the jurors believe these witnesses, they don't need any more evidence to find Strampel guilty

"They are consistent. They tell the same story over and over."

She stresses that victims don't need to resist or report.

"We know why these women did not report. They were scared of the defendant ability to control their careers."

John Dakmak now up for closing arguments in Strampel's defense

"We know he can be gruff. We know he speaks his mind. We know that he has the filter of a soldier and a physician."

On Nassar, Dakmak says "every time we say that name, we all think of the monster…at Michigan State. But it doesn’t have much to do with this case."